|
AnasTangi (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Both Coco & Igor died in the same year: 1971
dumbasaboxofhair (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@8tentacles I THOUGHT THE SAME AT FIRST, BUT THIS REALLY IS A MARVELOUS FILM.
PetitGrisMoineau (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Igor Stravinsky was such a badass in real life..! He was outstanding, eccentric, affective and interesting, much more interesting then Coco Chanel...and he was genius. This "Stravinsky" is boring as shit. I like the "Rite of the Spring" riot scene, I always wanted to see it (even though in the movie), moreover nice actors, clothes, cars, but everything else is booooooring. It would be better it they care a little bit less about erotic scenes and a little bit more about plot and characters.
FireAndIce0o0 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
the best thing about this film were the costumes. The acting was one-dimensional, the characters seriously underdeveloped (chanel had absolutely no spark) and the plot was weak. Lifetime did a better Chanel movie.
rainbowsun84 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@myhaterz3411 there were simply many wicked and erotic sex scenes and nudity between the two of them in the movie
Princesaaymara (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
8tentacles thanks so much for the answer I love the second part ..thank you so much
folladordeprostis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
This movie is in redbox
folladordeprostis (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@litheshadow YEHAHH!! HOT SEX SCENE AT 1.06
deutschesmaedchen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@8tentacles pretty sure she wouldn't care, she was an easy woman, it was well known. if she wasn't able to keep her sex life private when she was alive, I doubt a movie depiction would upset her. |