|
hctimo787 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I can only assume that person meant to click Reply to another post, since the point you made with yours was quite obvious.
perplexedone (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i dunno what you talking about, my comment was directed at devils fans who should see 'real interference' ala Niedermayer (Ducks) against Osgood (Wings) in game 3 of these stanley cup playoffs. So in essence I was agreeing with you and the rest of the ppl here that there was no interference, Brodeur cooked it up and Jussi scored a legitimate goal.
YourAlmaMater (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That wasn't enough interference, & it wasn't in the crease. What he did at the end was unacceptable.
wtfididuremom (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sry bud, but read the rule about goalie interference. It is to protect the goalie from impeding or not being able to save the shot, and obviously this is not goalie interference. Oh and by the way if you wanna try and pull a "he got hit by jussi," he was outside the crease. Sorry but only the Devils fans think it was goalie interference. Oh and eh was outside the crease, that is not his ice to try and defend. Marty was just caught in the moment.
perplexedone (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
if devils fans want to see real interference look at Niedermayer bowling over Osgood in game 3. That should have been a no-goal.
elcapitanc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@ 3.04 you can clearly see brodeur comes out of his crease for the ONLY reason to bump jokinen, NOT play the puck
whaler3232 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
BEST VIDEO OF THIS GOAL ON YOUTUBE!!!You should make a funny video from the reactions of those MSG bums!! HAHAHAHAGO CANES! GO WHALERS!
teuvvvo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Lapa jäähän ja PUM PUM PUM!
HockeyPwnsBaseball (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You can bump someone who doesn't have the puck. Especially when that person runs into you when you aren't looking at them |
